### Approach When addressing a questionable business expense submission, it's crucial to employ a structured framework that ensures clarity, professionalism, and adherence to company policies. Here’s a step-by-step breakdown of the thought process: 1. **Review the Submission**: Examine the details of the expense report closely. Take note of the specific items in question and any discrepancies that may arise. 2. **Understand Company Policy**: Familiarize yourself with the organization’s expense policy. This knowledge will provide the necessary context for evaluating the submission. 3. **Gather Additional Information**: If needed, reach out to the employee or relevant parties for clarification on the submitted expenses. This step is vital to ensure that you have a complete understanding of the situation. 4. **Assess Validity**: Determine whether the expenses align with company policy and if they are justifiable given the context of the business. 5. **Communicate Findings**: Prepare to communicate your findings and decisions clearly and professionally, ensuring that you maintain respect for the individual involved. 6. **Document the Process**: Keep a record of all communications and decisions made regarding the expense submission for future reference and accountability. ### Key Points - **Clarity and Transparency**: Interviewers seek candidates who can demonstrate clarity in their thought process and transparency in communication. - **Professionalism**: Always maintain a professional tone when discussing sensitive matters like expense submissions. - **Problem-Solving Skills**: Highlight your ability to resolve issues diplomatically while ensuring adherence to company policies. - **Communication**: Strong communication skills are essential, especially when discussing potentially sensitive topics. ### Standard Response Here’s a sample answer that illustrates how to effectively address a questionable business expense submission: --- “In my previous role as a Financial Analyst, I encountered a situation where an employee submitted a travel expense report that included several questionable charges. To address this, I followed a structured approach: 1. **Initial Review**: I first reviewed the expense report in detail, noting the items that seemed inconsistent with our company’s travel policy. For instance, there were charges for meals that exceeded the allowable limit and a hotel stay that was booked at a luxury establishment rather than a preferred vendor. 2. **Policy Familiarization**: Next, I consulted our company’s expense reimbursement policy to ensure I had a clear understanding of the guidelines that govern acceptable expenses. 3. **Clarification**: I reached out to the employee to discuss the report. I asked for clarification on the high meal costs and the choice of hotel. It turned out that the employee had hosted a client dinner, which explained the meal expenses, and they had opted for the luxury hotel based on client preference. 4. **Validity Assessment**: After gathering this information, I assessed whether the expenses could be justified under our policy. Given the context of client relations, I determined that the meal expenses were reasonable, but I recommended that the employee consider more cost-effective options in the future. 5. **Communication of Findings**: I then communicated my findings to the employee in a professional manner, emphasizing our policy but also acknowledging the importance of client relationships. I approved the justified expenses while also providing guidance on future submissions. 6. **Documentation**: Finally, I documented the entire process, ensuring there was a record of our communication and the rationale behind the approval of the expenses. This experience reinforced my belief in the importance of clear communication and adherence to policy while also being flexible enough to consider the business context.” --- ### Tips & Variations #### Common Mistakes to Avoid - **Ignoring Company Policy**: Ensure you are familiar with the expense policies before making any judgments. - **Being Confrontational**: Approach the situation diplomatically to maintain good relationships. - **Failing to Document**: Always document your process to protect both yourself and the organization. #### Alternative Ways to Answer - **Emphasizing Team Collaboration**: Highlight how you involve other team members or departments if needed, such as consulting with HR or Finance. - **Focusing on Learning**: Discuss how you use these situations to educate employees about expense policies. #### Role-Specific Variations - **Technical Roles**: Discuss how you would analyze the financial implications of the expenses on project budgets and timelines. - **Managerial Roles**: Emphasize leadership in guiding team members on proper expense reporting, fostering a culture of accountability. - **Creative Roles**: Talk about how creative projects sometimes require flexibility in expense reporting, and how you balance this with policy adherence. #### Follow-Up Questions 1. **How do you handle repeated questionable submissions from the same employee?** 2. **What steps would you take if the employee disagrees with your assessment?** 3. **Can you give an example of a time when your assessment was challenged, and how did you handle it?** By following this structured approach, job seekers can prepare a compelling response to the interview question about addressing questionable business expense submissions. This preparation